Insights · Brand, CX and Launch Strategy
SIA’s S$2 Billion Business Class: Great Seat, Messy Launch, Missing Research
Singapore Airlines built a better business class seat and launched it badly. The colour debate is the noise. The research question is the lesson for every marketing and CX leader.
The reactionA better seat, a louder response
On 6 November, SIA unveiled a cabin programme worth more than S$2 billion (about US$1.56 billion) across first, business, premium economy and economy. Rollout starts in the second half of 2027, on retrofitted A350-900s and new 777-9s.
The business class hardware is a real step up: sliding privacy doors, a 79-inch full-flat bed, a 1-2-1 layout, 22-inch 4K screens, wireless charging and, for the first time, pyjamas. First class gets what SIA calls the largest double bed in commercial aviation.
Then people saw the colours. Business class, designed by BMW’s Designworks, runs on mineral grey, cool yellow, blue, silver and blue-black, a deliberate break from SIA’s warm cabin history. Within days it had been compared to a dental chair, a gaming chair and a budget airline. Ben Schlappig of One Mile at a Time wrote that it looks like Scoot and Spirit Airlines had a baby.
Source: CARMA social listening, as reported by Marketing-Interactive. Design made up 38.2% of the conversation monitored. Truescope separately recorded 113,392 engagements, with business class drawing 35.7% of them and TikTok generating 92% of shares.
Note what the criticism is not about. Even the harshest reviewers say the seat itself ticks the boxes. The fight is over the skin.
The researchWhat SIA says it did, and what we do not know
SIA’s defence rests on one claim: the cabins were shaped by research with more than 5,000 frequent travellers, customers, staff and industry experts worldwide. The methods named in SIA’s launch release are focus groups, interviews, surveys and concept testing, covering how people work, dine, relax and sleep on board. The headline finding was demand for privacy, comfort, intuitive functions and flexibility.
On colour, the only research claim comes from Ong Wah Li, SIA’s VP of Product Experience: customers said they wanted a more modern, refreshed look. She also said SIA does not follow a fixed palette across its cabins. Every outlet covering the launch repeats the same release.
| Question | What SIA has said |
|---|---|
| Sample size | Disclosed More than 5,000 in total |
| Who was in it | Disclosed Frequent travellers, customers, staff, industry experts |
| Methods | Disclosed Focus groups, interviews, surveys, concept testing |
| Split between those groups | Not disclosed |
| Demographics (age, nationality, gender, travel purpose) | Not disclosed |
| Mix of cabin classes among respondents | Not disclosed |
| Sample size per method | Not disclosed |
| Was the final grey and yellow palette shown to customers? | Not disclosed |
| Results, scores or preference rankings | Not disclosed |
| Independent verification | None found |
One caution on sourcing. A single trade outlet describes the concept testing as physical, but that detail is not in other coverage of the release, so treat it as unconfirmed. Schlappig’s reference to feedback from hundreds of customers is his description, not a figure from SIA.
The diagnosisWhere the research may have fallen short
Inference, not factSIA has not shown its work, so what follows is our read, not a finding. But the pattern is familiar to anyone who has run customer research for a brand.
The 5,000 is a blended number. Staff and industry experts are not paying premium customers, and their tastes may differ from those who pay the fare. Without a split, 5,000 works as a PR figure, not a sample you can evaluate.
“Modern” is a direction, not a design. Ask travellers whether they want a fresher cabin and almost everyone says yes. That does not tell you they want mineral grey with cool yellow on a brand built on warmth. The gap between a directional preference and a tested execution is where this likely went wrong. Schlappig’s sharper point is that the design brief itself, which Designworks’ CEO described as a suit with a sneaker, may have been wrong for an airline known for warmth flying some of the world’s longest routes, where many premium passengers are not travelling on business.
Stated preference is not brand fit. The research reportedly focused on how people work, eat and sleep. Those are functional questions, and the seat answers them well. Palette is an emotional and identity question. The people best placed to judge it are the airline’s most loyal customers, and some of them are now objecting loudly. One former crew member and PPS Club member said it is hard to stay loyal after seeing the seat.
The timeline cuts both ways. The rollout slipped to 2027 on supply chain and certification delays. SIA told one reporter it used the extra time to keep refining the products through customer feedback and testing. That suggests research continued late. It does not tell us whether the palette was part of it, or whether anyone could still change it.
One more signal. The MileLion flagged hard plastics on the side console, a light grey surface that will see wine and coffee, and a motif based on a 2011 NASA mission rather than SIA’s batik. None of those is a colour-preference question. They are craft choices, and craft is what SIA’s brand trades on.
The responseHow the handling made it bigger
A design miss is recoverable. A confused response is harder to walk back.
SIA first defended the finishes for several days. Executives said customers asked for modern, that the colours were carefully selected, and that brand cohesion goes beyond colour to the end-to-end experience. Designworks’ CEO called the look refreshing and progressive.
Then came the 11 November staff town hall. CEO Goh Choon Phong said SIA would look at what is feasible, while also suggesting customers will like the seats once they experience the comfort. The chief commercial officer called it a learning point and invoked the 80-20 rule, the idea that you cannot please everyone.
That framing is the problem. Schlappig reports he could not find a single reader who liked the design, and the best he heard was that people did not mind it. If sentiment looks closer to 99-1 than 80-20, the 80-20 line reads as dismissal. Telling critics they will come around once they sit in the seat concedes the point: the product is good and the design is the issue.
The mixed message is the real cost. Defend for days, then soften, and you get neither the credit of conviction nor the credit of listening.
The launch channel mattered too. SIA seeded creators to show the cabins, and the same feeds carried the criticism. Truescope’s Kelvin Koh made the fair point that the reaction is a debate about what people expect from a premium national carrier, not a rejection of the investment. That is a more useful read than “the internet is mean”.
The balanceThe fair counterpoint
Before we declare a fiasco, three caveats.
The loudest critics are points-and-miles bloggers, influencers and loyalty members. They are engaged and influential, but they are a small slice of premium travellers. Social sentiment skews toward enthusiasts.
No one has shown any effect on bookings, and the seats do not fly until the second half of 2027. A programme this size will roll out over years, reportedly through 2030.
And some of the hardware catches SIA up rather than leaps ahead. Sliding doors have been standard at rivals for a while. As Nafe Tong of ABrandADay noted, a later mover can learn from others. There is also a commercial logic to giving each cabin its own personality, since distinct cabins give passengers reasons to trade up.
None of this rescues the research claim. It does mean the stakes are about brand equity and trust, not an imminent revenue cliff.
The view from MAMCJudge it on comfort, not colour
I am less bothered by the palette than much of the internet, and I would rather judge this seat on how it actually feels. That is the test that decides whether S$2 billion was well spent.
Why I am not losing sleep over the colours. Colour is the most subjective part of the design and also the most fixable. Finishes can be tweaked, and SIA has pointed to adjustable in-flight LED lighting, which changes how a cabin reads. Show-floor renders and launch-event lighting are also a poor guide to how a cabin feels at 2am over the Pacific. Brands have to evolve, and giving each cabin its own character is a legitimate commercial choice. I would rather SIA took a swing than froze its look in place.
What I am actually watching. Whether the seat delivers on comfort. Early hands-on impressions are positive on the ergonomics and the generous footwell. But the MileLion’s own caveat is that it was a short on-ground tour, and a few minutes in a seat is not a 14-hour sector. The real questions are whether the bed sleeps well, whether the 24-inch-wide seat feels secure rather than cramped, and whether the materials hold up to long-haul use. Those answers will not come until the seats fly in the second half of 2027.
Where the criticism still has a point. Not the colour itself, but two things around it. SIA has leaned on its research without showing it, which invites scepticism. And the defend-then-soften sequence, plus the 80-20 comment, made a design debate look like a listening problem. Both are fixable and neither needs a redesign.
What I would do in their seat.
- Put the seat in front of frequent premium flyers on real long-haul sectors and share what they report on sleep and comfort
- Publish enough of the research to be credible: the sample split, the methods, and what was actually tested
- Treat the finishes as a refinement to make where feasible, not a crisis
- Judge success on post-flight satisfaction and premium yield in 2027, not on TikTok sentiment in week one
Bottom line. For me the seat is what decides this. If it sleeps well and feels good over a long flight, the colour becomes a footnote. If it does not, no palette will save it. The lesson from this launch is about how to communicate and evidence a design choice, more than about grey and yellow.
The takeawaysWhat marketing and CX leaders should take from this
- Test the execution, not the aspiration.“Customers want modern” is a brief, not a validation. Show the actual palette, in context, to the people who define your brand.
- Weight your sample by who pays and who stays.Blending customers, staff and experts into one headline number hides who actually agreed. Report the split.
- Treat loyalists as a brand-fit panel.Your most invested customers are the early warning system for identity drift. Ask them before launch, not after.
- Cohesion lives in the cues people recognise.SIA’s batik, warmth and craft are what make it SIA. As one branding director put it, “Being different is fine. Being disconnected is the risk.”
- Pick a line and hold it.Defending for days and then conceding is worse than either. Decide before launch what you will and will not change.
- Publish your methodology when you cite your research.If research is your defence, show enough of it to be credible. Otherwise it becomes a talking point critics can ignore.
The open questionsWhat SIA should answer
SIA will preview the cabins to the public at Jewel Changi Airport and Changi Terminal 3 in early 2027. That is a natural moment to answer these:
- How were the 5,000 respondents split between customers, staff and industry experts?
- What was the demographic and travel-purpose profile of the customers, and how many flew premium cabins?
- What was the sample size for each method: focus groups, interviews, surveys and concept testing?
- Was the final grey, yellow and blue business class palette shown to customers, and if so in what form?
- How did PPS Club and other loyal members rate it compared with other travellers?
- What changed in the design as a result of customer feedback during the delay to 2027?
- Is the finish still adjustable, and by what date does that window close?
Launching something big?
Mad About Marketing Consulting helps marketing and CX leaders pressure test the research, the brand fit and the launch narrative before the market does.
Explore how MAMC can helpSources
Researched 13 November 2026. The first two were read in full; the rest were read as search excerpts, so check them before quoting.
- One Mile at a Time: SIA reconsiders new business class seat design (town hall, executive and Designworks comments)
- Marketing-Interactive: SIA’s influencer-led cabin reveal hits turbulence (CARMA and Truescope data, brand expert comments)
- CNBC: SIA new first and business class (specs and timeline)
- LoyaltyLobby: SIA launch release (research claim, design partners)
- Mainly Miles: new first and business class (palette, SIA statement)
- The MileLion: 10 insights from the launch (materials, motif, refinement comment)
- Mothership: SIA CEO on colourway criticism
- Malay Mail via Yahoo: dental-chair backlash
- Stomp: grey and yellow seats, public previews
- The Star: supply chain and certification delay
- CAPA: SIA to invest US$1.5bn (certification status)
