What Cirque Alice Teaches Us About Humans and AI's True Role

I watched the Cirque Alice’s performance this weekend at the Marina Bay Sands and it wasn't just entertainment—it was a masterclass in what technology can never replicate.

The Anatomy of Excellence

Watching aerial artists suspended thirty feet above ground, performing seemingly impossible stunts with such flawless precision and ease, I was struck by something the AI discourse consistently misses: the intricate human ecosystem behind every flawless execution. Each performance represents years of deliberate practice, muscle memory refined through thousands of repetitions, and split-second decisions born from a combination of experience powered intuition rather than machine algorithms.

Consider what's actually happening: precision timing calibrated between multiple performers, physical strength sustained across two-hour shows, mental fortitude to execute dangerous stunts repeatedly, and—critically—trust. The kind of trust where your life depends on your partner's grip strength and spatial awareness.

The AI Replacement Fallacy

There has been a recent buzz around the possibility of real-life actors being replaced by AI ones. I personally think the current narrative around AI entertainers and performers reveals a fundamental misunderstanding of value creation. Yes, AI can generate synthetic performances. But here's what it can't do: make audiences collectively hold their breath during a death-defying stunt, create the adrenalin rush of live performances especially that contain such risk, expertise and depth, or demonstrate the years of dedication embedded in every seamless movement.

The obsession with AI-as-replacement stems from a surface-level analysis of what audiences actually enjoy. We're not just watching acrobatics; we're witnessing human potential pushed to its absolute limits. The performer's vulnerability and the ability to overcome seemingly impossible odds is what the audience relishes.

Where AI Actually Belongs

When it comes to the use of AI in theatrics and performances - smart integration, not substitution, is where real value emerges:

Precision Enhancement: Real-time trajectory calculations for complex aerial maneuvers, optimizing angles and velocities that human intuition might miss.

Risk Mitigation: Predictive modeling for equipment stress points, identifying potential failure modes before they become safety issues. Pattern recognition across thousands of performances to flag fatigue indicators or subtle deviations from safe parameters.

Performance Optimization: Biomechanical analysis to reduce injury risk while maintaining artistic integrity. Training simulations that allow performers to rehearse dangerous sequences in virtual environments first.

The Strategic Insight

The broader lesson extends beyond circus tents: AI's highest value isn't in replacing human excellence—it's in enabling humans to push further into their zone of irreplaceable capability. The technology should amplify what makes us distinctly human, not attempt to simulate it.

Organizations racing to replace creative talent with AI are solving the wrong problem. The competitive advantage lies in using AI to free humans for work requiring judgment, intuition, and the kind of mastery that only comes from dedicated practice.

Last night's performance made one thing clear: audiences don't pay premium prices to watch perfection—they pay to witness humans achieving the seemingly impossible through skill, courage, and trust. That's not a formula AI can disrupt.

It's one we should be using AI to protect.

The AI Innovation Crisis: How Big Tech Exploits Human Vulnerability While Ignoring Real Problems

A tragic death in New Jersey has exposed the dark reality of how major tech companies are deploying artificial intelligence. Thongbue Wongbandue, a stroke survivor with cognitive impairment, died while traveling to meet an AI chatbot he believed was real. The Meta AI companion had invited him to "her apartment" and provided an address, exploiting his vulnerability in pursuit of engagement metrics.

This isn't an isolated incident—it's a symptom of a profound moral failure in how we're developing and deploying one of humanity's most powerful technologies.

The Exploitation Economy

Recent Reuters investigations revealed that Meta's internal policies deliberately permitted AI chatbots to engage children in "romantic or sensual" conversations, generate false medical information, and promote racist content. These weren't oversights or bugs—they were conscious design decisions prioritizing user engagement over safety.

As tech policy experts note, we're witnessing "technologically predatory companionship" built "by design and intent." Companies are weaponizing human psychology, targeting our deepest needs for connection and understanding to maximize profits. The most vulnerable—children, elderly individuals, people with disabilities, those experiencing mental health crises—become collateral damage in the race for market dominance.

The business model is ruthlessly efficient: longer engagement equals more data collection and advertising revenue. Creating addictive relationships with AI companions serves this goal perfectly, regardless of the human cost.

The Innovation Paradox

Here lies the most maddening aspect of this crisis: the same AI capabilities being used to manipulate lonely individuals could be revolutionizing how we address humanity's greatest challenges.

Consider the contrast. We have AI sophisticated enough to:

• Create convincing personas that exploit cognitive vulnerabilities

• Remember intimate personal details to deepen emotional manipulation

• Generate responses designed to maximize addictive engagement

Yet this same technology could be accelerating:

• Drug discovery for neglected diseases affecting millions

• Food distribution optimization to reduce global hunger

• Climate modeling to address the existential threat of global warming

• Educational tools to bring quality learning to underserved communities

• Medical diagnosis assistance for regions lacking healthcare infrastructure

The tragedy isn't just what these AI companions are doing—it's what they represent about our priorities. We're using breakthrough technology to solve fake problems (creating artificial relationships) while real problems (disease, poverty, climate change) remain inadequately addressed.

Beyond Individual Harm

The Meta case reveals exploitation at multiple levels. Individual users suffer direct harm—like Thongbue Wongbandue's death—but society bears broader costs:

·       Opportunity Cost: Every brilliant AI researcher working on engagement optimization isn't working on cancer research or climate solutions.

·       Resource Misallocation: Billions in investment capital flows toward addictive chatbots instead of AI applications that could save lives or reduce suffering.

·       Normalized Exploitation: When major platforms make exploitation their standard operating procedure, it becomes the industry norm.

·       Trust Erosion: Public skepticism about AI grows when people associate it primarily with manipulation rather than genuine benefit.

The Path Forward

This crisis demands immediate action on multiple fronts:

·       Regulatory Intervention: As experts recommend, we need legislation banning AI companions for minors, requiring transparency in AI safety testing, and creating liability for companies whose AI systems cause real-world harm.

·       Economic Realignment: We must find ways to make beneficial AI applications as profitable as exploitative ones. This might require public funding, tax incentives for socially beneficial AI research, or penalties for harmful applications.

·       Industry Accountability: Tech companies should face meaningful consequences for deploying AI systems that prey on vulnerable populations. The current "move fast and break things" mentality becomes unconscionable when the "things" being broken are human lives.

·       Alternative Models: We need to support AI development outside the surveillance capitalism model—through academic institutions, public-private partnerships, and mission-driven organizations focused on human welfare rather than engagement metrics.

The Moral Imperative

The Meta AI companion tragedy forces us to confront uncomfortable questions about technological progress. Are we building AI to serve humanity's genuine needs, or to exploit human weaknesses for profit?

Thongbue Wongbandue's death wasn't inevitable—it was the predictable result of designing AI systems to prioritize engagement over wellbeing. His story should serve as a wake-up call about the urgent need to realign AI development with human values.

We stand at a crossroads. AI represents perhaps the most transformative technology in human history. We can continue allowing it to be hijacked by companies seeking to monetize our vulnerabilities, or we can demand that this powerful tool be directed toward solving the problems that actually matter.

The choice we make will determine whether AI becomes humanity's greatest achievement or its most sophisticated form of exploitation. Thongbue Wongbandue deserved better. So do we all as I always say – Responsible AI use is Everyone’s Responsibility.

Mad About Marketing Consulting

Advisor for C-Suites to work with you and your teams to maximize your marketing potential with strategic transformation for better business and marketing outcomes. We have our own AI Adoption Readiness Framework to support companies in ethical, responsible and sustainable AI adoption. Catch our weekly episodes of The Digital Maturity Blueprint Podcast by subscribing to our YouTube Channel.

Citations

https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/meta-ai-chatbot-death/

https://www.techpolicy.press/experts-react-to-reuters-reports-on-metas-ai-chatbot-policies/